I must say that I disagree with both hosts of #librelounge on the Github acquisition and Google SoC.
Indeed Github was never free, but it was an independent company, now it's in the hands of *the* historical enemy of free software. That's worrying, because alternatives do not really exist. We were too busy enjoying the PR workflow to really think about it. Niche alternatives won't replace the large community there, and most of these people don't care at all about freedom. So it's a loss.
@CharredStencil Yes, here "permissive" means "submissive to market appropriation". Choosing a so-called permissive license is allowing corporations to restrict further cooperation : granting people the right to restrict your freedom is not permissive, it's masochistic.
On the other hand so-called "restrictive" licenses only restrict other people from restricting your freedom.
We should revolt against the inversion of meaning so prominent in contemporary propaganda. Orwell warned us.
This instance is provided by Petites Singularités ASBL for like-minded people in Brussels and elsewhere.
We speak English, French, Dutch.
P.S.: works with free software and grassroots activists across disciplines, ranging from agro-ecology to cartography, libre aesthetics & ethics, (self-)organization & policy.
Send donations to IBAN BE16 3630 1548 4674 (Petites Singularités ASBL) with mention “ps.s10y.eu” (and your name if and only if you want to be credited): we publish donations as we receive them, and expenses. Yearly service is expected to cost ~ 150 € (without sysadmin expenses.)
“We've got to fight the government, fight the oligarchy, fight capitalism, be internationalist and fight the empire because it's the best hope to enrich hundreds of millions of lives, and build towards a truly equitable future.”
— Abby Martin